September 25. I read that Cardinal Giovanni Angelo Becciu has resigned suddenly over a scandal concerning the purchase of property in London.
This is, of course, not the first time that a large sum has been used to buy housing in the world capital of laundering illegitimate money. What caught my eye was the role in the Vatican played by the Cardinal, which presumably will be carried on by his successor. The corrupt prelate was in charge of the department that decides who will become saints.
It might be supposed that in this time of crisis, when the wrath of God is being visited on the children of disobedience, we are in sore need of such exemplary figures. Since the early days of the pandemic, there has been chorus of praise in the media for the devotion in particular of health professionals who were risking their lives to save the afflicted. The now discontinued collective applause on Thursday evenings was a diffuse recognition of their selfless dedication.
It is important, however, to look carefully at the criteria for canonisation in the Catholic Church. Besides leading an ‘exemplary life of goodness and virtue worthy of imitation’, and ideally having suffered martyrdom, the candidate also has to be shown to have performed directly or posthumously two miracles. Much of Cardinal Becciu’s time will have been spent sifting out candidates who were exemplary moral beings but could not display the requisite number of verifiable miraculous actions.
A miracle is a divine event that has no natural or scientific basis. The latest English saint, Cardinal Newman, was credited with curing a man’s spinal disease and a woman’s unstoppable bleeding. I used to teach Newman’s theology for a living as part of a Master’s course in Victorian culture. He was the leading Christian intellectual of his generation in England, first in the Church of England, and then following his conversion in 1845, in the Catholic Church. None of his writings, and no scholarly examination of his career, ever featured a personal role curing the sick, but the Vatican managed to find two instances which could not be explained by medical science.
It could be argued that this kind of saint is nothing but a threat in our present difficulties. The public figure who by his own estimation mostly closely fulfils the criteria of performing actions that defy scientific reasoning is Donald Trump. Since the outset he has made predictions about the course of coronavirus and the efficacy of remedies (including bleach) that are not only unsupported by medical knowledge but in his terms are the more credible because they are the product of a higher grasp of the truth. Trump evidently believes that he has access to knowledge that has more authority than the reasoning of toiling scientists. So, by extension, the internet is awash with covid-19 cures sold on the basis of their superiority to orthodox medicine.
We see it also in the pale imitations of Trump who govern our destiny in Britain. Whilst they must make a profession of listening to scientists, their narrative of progress is essentially magical. Johnson has made a series of proclamations about the course of the pandemic which have no basis in evidence-based fact, but are justified only by private insight into the future. Similarly his hapless Health Secrecy has promulgated achievements and targets for track and testing (with a new app launched yesterday) that are the product of faith rather than substantive calculation.
Now, more than ever, we should seek solutions that have a rational or scientific basis. We want leaders of goodness and exemplary virtue; we have no use for saints.
That said, the odd martyrdom would not come amiss. St Dominic Cummings would be a good start.